Article Text
Abstract
Eli Feiring has developed a concept of forward-looking responsibility in healthcare. On this account, what matters morally in the allocation of scarce healthcare resources is not people's past behaviours but rather their commitment to take on lifestyles that will increase the benefit acquired from received treatment. According to Feiring, this is to be preferred over the backward-looking concept of responsibility often associated with luck egalitarianism. The article critically scrutinises Feiring's position. It begins by spelling out the wider implications of Feiring's view. Against this background, it shows that (i) Feiring's distinction between backward-looking and forward-looking responsibility is incompatible with the Scanlonian notion of responsibility she apparently endorses; (ii) her favoured forward-looking notion of responsibility is subject to the objections levelled against the luck egalitarian view (whatever the strength of such objections).
- Allocation of Health Care Resources
- Distributive Justice
- Ethics
- Health Care Economics
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Just health responsibility
- Lifestyle, responsibility and justice
- A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare
- Distributive justice and the harm to medical professionals fighting epidemics
- Solidarity, justice and unconditional access to healthcare
- Voluntary sterilisation and access to IVF in Québec
- Rare diseases in healthcare priority setting: should rarity matter?
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should