Article Text
Abstract
It has been argued that organs should be treated as individual tradable property like other material possessions and assets, on the basis that this would promote individual freedom and increase efficiency in addressing the shortage of organs for transplantation. If organs are to be treated as property, should they be inheritable? This paper seeks to contribute to the idea of organs as inheritable property by providing a defence of a default of the family of a dead person as inheritors of transplantable organs. In the course of discussion, various succession rules for organs and their justifications will be suggested. We then consider two objections to organs as inheritable property. Our intention here is to provoke further thought on whether ownership of one's body parts should be assimilated to property ownership.
- Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
- Transplantation
- Ownership
- Allocation of Organs/Tissues
- Rights
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Law, ethics and medicine
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human-tissue-related inventions: ownership and intellectual property rights in international collaborative research in developing countries
- Body parts in property theory: an integrated framework
- The argument for property rights in body parts: scarcity of resources
- Intellectual property rights and detached human body parts
- Bodily rights and property rights
- The current approach of the courts
- Interconnected, inhabited and insecure: why bodies should not be property
- A “Queen of Hearts” trial of organ markets: why Scheper-Hughes’s objections to markets in human organs fail
- Modified mandated choice for organ procurement
- Property and the body: Applying Honoré