Article info
Research ethics
Paper
Personal knowledge and study participation
- Correspondence to Professor Rebecca Dresser, Schools of Law and Medicine, Washington University School of Law, Box 1120, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA; dresser{at}wulaw.wustl.edu
Citation
Personal knowledge and study participation
Publication history
- Received January 29, 2013
- Revised April 26, 2013
- Accepted June 3, 2013
- First published June 20, 2013.
Online issue publication
June 17, 2014
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 June 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process
- Limits to research risks
- An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research
- What makes clinical labour different? The case of human guinea pigging
- Community based trials and informed consent in rural north India
- ‘You want to deal with power while riding on power’: global perspectives on power in participatory health research and co-production approaches
- The case for a new system for oversight of research on human subjects
- ‘I feel that I should decide on my own….’: who should be involved in the decision-making process for adolescent involvement in HIV research?
- Genetic research and the collective good: participants as leaders to reconcile individual and public interests
- Human infection challenge studies in endemic settings and/or low-income and middle-income countries: key points of ethical consensus and controversy