Article info
PDFCommentary
Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child's best interests: why the anatomical details matter
- Correspondence to David P Lang, Department of Philosophy, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA; david.lang{at}bc.edu
Citation
Circumcision, sexual dysfunction and the child's best interests: why the anatomical details matter
Publication history
- Received April 8, 2013
- Accepted April 23, 2013
- First published May 22, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The surgical anatomy of the perineum
- After Cologne: male circumcision and the law. Parental right, religious liberty or criminal assault?
- Review of in situ and invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma and associated non-neoplastic dermatological conditions
- Medical aspects of male circumcision
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Prophylactic interventions on children: balancing human rights with public health
- How does male circumcision protect against HIV infection?
- Circumcision in boys and girls: why the double standard?
- Detection of human papillomavirus in urine among heterosexual men in relation to location of genital warts and circumcision status