Article Text
Abstract
There is an emerging ethical consensus that injured research participants should receive medical care and compensation for their research-related injuries. This consensus is premised on notions of beneficence, distributive justice, compensatory justice and reciprocity. In response, countries around the world have implemented no-fault compensation systems to ensure that research participants are adequately protected in the event of injury. The United States, the world's leading sponsor of research, has chosen instead to rely on its legal system to provide injured research participants with medical care and compensation. This article argues that US reliance on its legal system leaves injured research participants unprotected in the event of injury. Nearly every injured research participant will have difficulty receiving compensation in court, and certain classes of research participants will be barred from receiving compensation altogether. The United States’ outlier status also threatens to impede US-sponsored multinational research, potentially delaying important biomedical advances. To rectify this injustice, researchers, Institutional Review Boards, sponsors and research institutions should advocate systematic no-fault compensation in the United States to bring US law into accord with global ethical norms and ensure that injured research participants are adequately protected.
- Tort Law
- Research Ethics
- Law
- Public Policy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Review of policies for injuries to research participants in India
- Appropriateness of no-fault compensation for research-related injuries from an African perspective: an appeal for action by African countries
- Waiving legal rights in research
- Better recognition for research participants: what society should learn from covid-19
- Regulating international clinical research: an ethical framework for policy-makers
- Developing ethics guidance for HIV prevention research: the HIV Prevention Trials Network approach
- No-fault compensation systems
- Compensation and hazard pay for key workers during an epidemic: an argument from analogy
- Ethical and legal issues in research involving human subjects: do you want a piece of me?
- Fault lines: resolving clinical negligence claims