Article info
PDFBrief report
Lay REC members: patient or public?
- Correspondence to Dr Kristina Staley, TwoCan Associates, Hove, Sussex, UK; Kristina{at}twocanassociates.co.uk
Citation
Lay REC members: patient or public?
Publication history
- Received March 8, 2012
- Revised December 12, 2012
- Accepted March 11, 2013
- First published March 27, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Standards for research ethics committees: purpose, problems and the possibilities of other approaches
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Medical student attitudes to patient involvement in healthcare decision-making and research
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Patient organisations’ views, motivations and experiences on patient involvement in cancer research: a pilot study in Portugal
- Can an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement project
- Public and patient involvement in child health research and service improvements: a survey of hospital doctors
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study