Article Text

other Versions

PDF
The case for a duty to research: not yet proven
  1. Iain Brassington
  1. Correspondence to Dr Iain Brassington, CSEP/iSEI/ School of Law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; iain.brassington{at}manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

In this commentary on ‘Why Participating in (Certain) Scientific Research is a Moral Duty’, I take issue with a number of Stjernschantz Forsberg et al's claims. Though abiding by the terms of a contract might be obligatory, this won't show that those terms themselves indicate a duty—even allowing that there's a contract to begin with. Meanwhile, though we might have reasons to participate, not all reasons are moral reasons, and the paper does not establish that the reasons here are moral in character.

  • Research Ethics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles