Article info
PDFNeuroethics
Paper
Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Correspondence to Professor Vojin Rakić, Center for the Study of Bioethics, Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, University of Belgrade, Beograd 11000, Serbia; vojinrakic{at}hotmail.com
Citation
Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
Publication history
- Received March 27, 2012
- Revised December 17, 2012
- Accepted January 7, 2013
- First published February 14, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Freedom and moral enhancement
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Are we unfit for the future?
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu