Article Text
Abstract
Sterilisation is the most desired method of contraception worldwide. In 1996, the Brazilian Congress approved a family planning law that legitimised female and male sterilisation, but forbade sterilisation during childbirth. As a result of this law, procedures currently occur in a clandestine nature upon payment. Despite the law, sterilisations continue to be performed during caesarean sections. The permanence of the method is an important consideration; therefore, information about other methods must be made available. Tubal sterilisation must not be the only choice. We argue that review of this restriction will not contribute to the increase in caesarean sections but will allow for greater sterilisation choice for men and women.
- Family
- Autonomy
- Availability of Contraceptives to Minors
- Behaviour Modification
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- FIGO's ethical recommendations on female sterilisation will do more harm than good: a commentary
- Voluntary sterilisation and access to IVF in Québec
- Autonomy, age and sterilisation requests
- Understanding quality of contraceptive services from women’s perspectives in Gujarat, India: a focus group study
- Contraception for women: an evidence based overview
- Impact of free maternity policies in Kenya: an interrupted time-series analysis
- The distance-quality trade-off in women’s choice of family planning provider in North Eastern Tanzania
- Understanding the relationship between family planning method choices and modern contraceptive use: an analysis of geographically linked population and health facilities data in Haiti
- Factors associated with modern contraceptive demands satisfied among currently married/in-union women of reproductive age in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of the 2016 Demographic and Health Survey
- Voluntary sterilisation of young childless women: not so fast