Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Participant experience of invasive research in adults with intellectual disability
  1. Catherine Jane McAllister,
  2. Claire Louise Kelly,
  3. Katherine Elizabeth Manning,
  4. Anthony John Holland
  1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
  1. Correspondence to Catherine Jane McAllister, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 8AH, UK; km511{at}medschl.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Clinical research is a necessity if effective and safe treatments are to be developed. However, this may well include the need for research that is best described as ‘invasive’ in that it may be associated with some discomfort or inconvenience. Limitations in the undertaking of invasive research involving people with intellectual disabilities (ID) are perhaps related to anxieties within the academic community and among ethics committees; however, the consequence of this neglect is that innovative treatments specific to people with ID may not be developed. Such concerns are likely to continue while there is limited published knowledge regarding the actual experiences of people with ID who have participated in invasive clinical research. As part of a pilot study trialling the novel use of a surgically inserted device to curb overeating in people with Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) we have investigated the experience of research through semistructured qualitative interviews involving three participants and their carers. Thematic analysis revealed that the adults with PWS and their family carers rated their participation positively, seeing it as a rewarding and enriching experience. This brief report discusses findings from our interview data in order to highlight strategies which may ensure that research is acceptable to participants, meets the necessary ethical standards and is able to achieve the aims set out by the researchers. To our knowledge, this is the first study to record experiences directly from people with PWS and their carers regarding their involvement in invasive clinical research.

  • Research Ethics
  • Scientific Research
  • Informed Consent
  • Patient perspective
  • Psychiatry

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.