Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Paper
Elective ventilation for organ donation: law, policy and public ethics
  1. John Coggon
  1. Correspondence to Dr John Coggon, Southampton Law School, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK; john.coggon{at}soton.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper examines questions concerning elective ventilation, contextualised within English law and policy. It presents the general debate with reference both to the Exeter Protocol on elective ventilation, and the considerable developments in legal principle since the time that that protocol was declared to be unlawful. I distinguish different aspects of what might be labelled elective ventilation policies under the following four headings: ‘basic elective ventilation’; ‘epistemically complex elective ventilation’; ‘practically complex elective ventilation’; and ‘epistemically and practically complex elective ventilation’. I give a legal analysis of each. In concluding remarks on their potential practical viability, I emphasise the importance not just of ascertaining the legal and ethical acceptability of these and other forms of elective ventilation, but also of assessing their professional and political acceptability. This importance relates both to the successful implementation of the individual practices, and to guarding against possible harmful effects in the wider efforts to increase the rates of posthumous organ donation.

  • Prolongation of Life and Euthanasia
  • Public Policy
  • Donation/Procurement of Organs/Tissues
  • Applied and Professional Ethics
  • Care of the Dying Patient

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.