You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentaries
Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics

https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100948

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • Disclaimer The opinions expressed are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the National Institutes of Health, the Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • Commentaries
      On ‘What makes killing wrong?’
      Julia Driver
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 39 8-8 Published Online First: 10 Aug 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100651
    • Commentaries
      On the wrongness of killing
      David DeGrazia
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 39 9-9 Published Online First: 08 Aug 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100652
    • Commentaries
      Killing and disabling: a comment on Sinnott-Armstrong and Miller
      Jeff McMahan
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 39 10-11 Published Online First: 02 Aug 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100570
    • Feature article
      What makes killing wrong?
      Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Franklin G Miller
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 39 3-7 Published Online First: 19 Jan 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100351
    • Current controversy
      Dependent relational animals
      Michael Bevins
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 39 15-16 Published Online First: 10 Aug 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100807

    Other content recommended for you