Article Text
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: ethical, legal and practical dilemmas
- A matter of life and death
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- Withdrawing and withholding artificial nutrition and hydration from patients in a minimally conscious state: Re: M and its repercussions
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions