Article info
PDFCommentaries
The moral status of post-persons
- Correspondence to Professor Michael Hauskeller, Department of Sociology and Philosophy, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX44RJ, UK; M.Hauskeller{at}exeter.ac.uk
Citation
The moral status of post-persons
Publication history
- Received July 12, 2012
- Accepted September 5, 2012
- First published September 27, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Devoured by our own children: the possibility and peril of moral status enhancement
- Is there a ‘new ethics of abortion’?