Article info
PDFCommentaries
On the wrongness of killing
- Correspondence to Dr David DeGrazia, Department of Philosophy, George Washington University, 801 22nd Street, N.W. Room 525, Washington, DC 20052, USA; ddd{at}gwu.edu
Citation
On the wrongness of killing
Publication history
- Received March 26, 2012
- Accepted July 11, 2012
- First published August 8, 2012.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- What makes killing wrong?
- Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule
- A concise argument: on the wrongness of killing
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Organismal death, the dead-donor rule and the ethics of vital organ procurement
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Killing versus totally disabling: a reply to critics
- Is heart transplantation after circulatory death compatible with the dead donor rule?
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan