Article Text
PDFCommentary
Three myths in end-of-life care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Contributors DW is the sole author.
-
Funding This work was supported by an early career fellowship from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1016641].
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan
- End-of-life decision-making for newborns: a 12-year experience in Hong Kong
- The impact of regional culture on intensive care end of life decision making: an Israeli perspective from the ETHICUS study
- Short-term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study
- Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- End of life decision-making in neonatal care
- End-of-life decision making in Taiwan: healthcare practice is rooted in local culture and laws that should be adjusted to patients' best interests
- Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community
- The agony of agonal respiration: is the last gasp necessary?