Article Text

other Versions

Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
  1. Gregory L Bock
  1. Department of Philosophy, Walters State Community College, Morristown, Tennessee, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Gregory L Bock, Department of Philosophy, Walters State Community College, 500 S Davy Crockett Pkwy, Morristown, TN 37813, USA; greg.bock{at}

This paper explores the scriptural and theological reasons given by Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) to refuse blood transfusions. Julian Savluescu and Richard W Momeyer argue that informed consent should be based on rational beliefs and that the refusal of blood transfusions by JWs is irrational, but after examining the reasons given by JWs, I challenge the claim that JW beliefs are irrational. I also question whether we should give up the traditional notion of informed consent.

Statistics from


  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Kenneth Boyd