Article Text
Abstract
It is universally accepted in bioethics that doctors and other medical professionals have an obligation to procure the informed consent of their patients. Informed consent is required because patients have the moral right to autonomy in furthering the pursuit of their most important goals. In the present work, it is argued that evidence from psychology shows that human beings are subject to a number of biases and limitations as reasoners, which can be expected to lower the quality of their decisions and which therefore make it more difficult for them to pursue their most important goals by giving informed consent. It is further argued that patient autonomy is best promoted by constraining the informed consent procedure. By limiting the degree of freedom patients have to choose, the good that informed consent is supposed to protect can be promoted.
- Bioethics
- philosophy of psychology
- moral responsibility
- neuroethics
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- The concise argument
Other content recommended for you
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Some limits of informed consent
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- Individual autonomy and state involvement in health care
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics
- Recent insights into decision-making and their implications for informed consent
- Patient centred medicine: reason, emotion, and human spirit? Some philosophical reflections on being with patients
- Egg freezing for non-medical uses: the lack of a relational approach to autonomy in the new Israeli policy and in academic discussion
- The impossibility of informed consent?