Article info
Commentary
Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status
- Correspondence to Dr Thomas Douglas, University of Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Littlegate House, Oxford, Oxfordshire OX1 1PT, UK; thomas.douglas{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status
Publication history
- Received September 21, 2011
- Accepted October 11, 2011
- First published December 14, 2011.
Online issue publication
February 17, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 December 2011).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Highlights from this issue
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- Persons, post-persons and thresholds
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Why we can't really say what post-persons are
- Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies