Responses
Clinical ethics
Paper
When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice
Compose a Response to This Article
Other responses
Jump to comment:
- Published on: 18 May 2017
- Published on: 18 May 2017When guideline aren't enoughShow More
Dear Editor,
Muirhead argues that Beauchamp and Childress' principalist approach to ethics is of little practical relevance to the majority of commonly occurring clinical ethical scenarios. Through analysis of three cases which involve conflict between the principles of autonomy and benefice, he demonstrates that many scenarios are well rehearsed with the "correct" answers enshrined in guideline and statute. His pap...
Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
Other content recommended for you
- When four principles are too many: a commentary
- Ethical framework for adult social care in COVID-19
- A new prescription for empirical ethics research in pharmacy: a critical review of the literature
- Using coercion in mental disorders or risking the patient’s death? An analysis of the protocols of a clinical ethics committee and a derived decision algorithm
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care
- Navigating parental requests: considering the relational potential standard in paediatric end-of-life care in the paediatric intensive care unit
- Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation
- Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?
- Informed consent in neurosurgery—translating ethical theory into action