Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
The principle of parity: the ‘placebo effect’ and physician communication
- Correspondence to Dr Charlotte Blease, School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen's University, 21 University Square, BT9 6TQ Belfast, UK; cblease02{at}qub.ac.uk
Citation
The principle of parity: the ‘placebo effect’ and physician communication
Publication history
- Received August 11, 2011
- Revised September 27, 2011
- Accepted September 29, 2011
- First published November 2, 2011.
Online issue publication
October 19, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- Sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity
- Placebos in chronic pain: evidence, theory, ethics, and use in clinical practice
- Placebo and nocebo effects and mechanisms associated with pharmacological interventions: an umbrella review
- The placebo effect: powerful, powerless or redundant?
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- Replication crisis and placebo studies: rebooting the bioethical debate
- Open notes in patient care: confining deceptive placebos to the past?
- The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?
- Open-label placebo clinical trials: is it the rationale, the interaction or the pill?