Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Correspondence to Osamu Muramoto, Center for Ethics in Health Care, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd UHN-86, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA; muramoto{at}ohsu.edu
Citation
Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
Publication history
- Received July 10, 2010
- Revised December 4, 2010
- Accepted December 16, 2010
- First published February 2, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Limits of advance directives in decision-making around food and nutrition in patients with dementia
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- The unfeasibility of requests for euthanasia in advance directives
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Advance directives for oral feeding in dementia: a response to Shelton and Geppert