Article info
PDFClinical ethics
A pilot study to examine research subjects' perception of participating in research in the emergency department
- Correspondence to Dr Michael P Phelan, Cleveland Clinic, Emergency Services Institute, Director of Quality and Patient Safety Emergency Services Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA; phelanm{at}ccf.org
Citation
A pilot study to examine research subjects' perception of participating in research in the emergency department
Publication history
- Received September 9, 2009
- Accepted December 22, 2009
- First published August 25, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2010, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- Research, engagement and public bioethics: promoting socially robust science
- Can informed consent to research be adapted to risk?
- Non-completion and informed consent
- Cultural considerations for informed consent in paediatric research in low/middle-income countries: a scoping review
- Informed consent to HIV cure research
- Understanding, interests and informed consent: a reply to Sreenivasan
- Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
- Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy