Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Controversies
A case of insufficient evidence equipoise: the NICE guidance on antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infective endocarditis
  1. R K Mohindra
  1. Correspondence to Dr R K Mohindra, 63 Newlands Road, High West Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 3NT, UK; raj.mohindra1{at}googlemail.com

Abstract

This paper argues that the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence should not offer guidance in situations where there is insufficient evidence equipoise about the potential benefit of the treatment in question. This is broadly for two reasons. First, without knowing if the treatment is effective no cost-effectiveness judgement can be logically made. Second, the implementation of a population wide change in treatment where there is equipoise amounts to a de facto clinical trial that falls outside the Clinical Trials Regulations. As such there are strong ethical and possibly legal grounds for preventing such an outcome.

Guidance based upon insufficient evidence equipoise also impacts upon the clinical discretion possessed by individual medical professionals.

  • NICE
  • equipoise
  • ethics
  • allocation of healthcare resources
  • population policy
  • policy guidelines/inst. review boards/review Cttes
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.