rss

Journal of Medical Ethics
Supplementary Material

Supplementary material related to the following articles is available online:

  • Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?

    • Peter Lepping,
    • Rajvinder Singh Sambhi,
    • and Karen Williams-Jones
    2010 36:170-173

  • Medical ethics and law for doctors of tomorrow: the 1998 Consensus Statement updated

    • G M Stirrat,
    • C Johnston,
    • R Gillon,
    • K Boyd,
    • and on behalf of the Medical Education Working Group of the Institute of Medical Ethics and associated signatories
    2010 36:55-60

  • Medical chaperoning at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: survey of physicians

    • E A Al-Gaai,
    • and M M Hammami
    2009 35:729-732

  • Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study

    • L Frith
    2009 35:662-667

  • Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN1412

    • P Knapp,
    • D K Raynor,
    • J Silcock,
    • and B Parkinson
    2009 35:573-578

  • Researchers’ preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain

    • M Ruiz-Canela,
    • J I Valle-Mansilla,
    • and D P Sulmasy
    2009 35:251-257

  • Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study

    • N Sofaer,
    • C Thiessen,
    • S D Goold,
    • J Ballou,
    • K A Getz,
    • G Koski,
    • R A Krueger,
    • and J S Weissman
    2009 35:183-188

  • Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research

    • A van der Vorm,
    • M J F J Vernooij-Dassen,
    • P G Kehoe,
    • M G M Olde Rikkert,
    • E van Leeuwen,
    • and W J M Dekkers
    2009 35:140-144

  • Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?

    • M Johri,
    • L J Damschroder,
    • B J Zikmund-Fisher,
    • S Y H Kim,
    • and P A Ubel
    2009 35:57-64

  • Optimising the documentation practices of an Ethics Consultation Service

    • K A Bramstedt,
    • A R Jonsen,
    • W S Andereck,
    • J W McGaughey,
    • and A B Neidich
    2009 35:47-50

  • Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study

    • J Reynolds,
    • N Crichton,
    • W Fisher,
    • and S Sacks
    2008 34:889-894

  • A report on small team clinical ethics consultation programmes in Japan

    • M Fukuyama,
    • A Asai,
    • K Itai,
    • and S Bito
    2008 34:858-862

  • Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos

    • S Camporesi,
    • and G Boniolo
    2008 34:821-825

  • Medical students’ attitudes towards abortion: a UK study

    • R Gleeson,
    • E Forde,
    • E Bates,
    • S Powell,
    • E Eadon-Jones,
    • and H Draper
    2008 34:783-787

  • Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children

    • P Weisleder
    2008 34:e8

  • Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers

    • N J Kerruish,
    • D Webster,
    • and N Dickson
    2008 34:648-652

  • Lives in a chiaroscuro. Should we suspend the puberty of children with gender identity disorder?

    • S Giordano
    2008 34:580-584

  • Illegal beings. Human cloning and the law

    • Daniela E Cutas
    2008 34:510

  • Malawians permit research bronchoscopy due to perceived need for healthcare

    • N Mtunthama,
    • R Malamba,
    • N French,
    • M E Molyneux,
    • E E Zijlstra,
    • and S B Gordon
    2008 34:303-307

  • Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?

    • R Saunders,
    • and J Savulescu
    2008 34:214-221

  • Should post-trial provision of beneficial experimental interventions be mandatory in developing countries?

    • Zhiyong Zong
    2008 34:188-192

  • A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries

    • G Bosshard,
    • B Broeckaert,
    • D Clark,
    • L J Materstvedt,
    • B Gordijn,
    • and H C Müller-Busch
    2008 34:28-32

  • Ethical and policy issues relating to progenitor-cell-based strategies for prevention of atherosclerosis

    • S M Liao,
    • P J Goldschmidt,
    • and J Sugarman
    2007 33:643-646

  • Ethics briefings

    • Veronica English,
    • Danielle Hamm,
    • Caroline Harrison,
    • Rebecca Mussell,
    • Julian Sheather,
    • and Ann Sommerville
    2007 33:433-434

  • Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations

    • Colleen C Denny,
    • and Christine Grady
    2007 33:382-385

  • CORRECTION 2007 33:310

  • Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students

    • C O Sham,
    • Y W Cheng,
    • K W Ho,
    • P H Lai,
    • L W Lo,
    • H L Wan,
    • C Y Wong,
    • Y N Yeung,
    • S H Yuen,
    • and A Y C Wong
    2007 33:261-265

  • Concepts of "person" and "liberty," and their implications to our fading notions of autonomy

    • Tuija Takala
    2007 33:225-228

  • The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants

    • Calixto Machado,
    • Julius Kerein,
    • Yazmina Ferrer,
    • Liana Portela,
    • Maria de la C García,
    • and José M Manero
    2007 33:197-200

  • Kant, curves and medical learning practice: a reply to Le Morvan and Stock

    • J Ives
    2007 33:119-122

  • CORRECTION 2007 33:93

  • Medical futility: a conceptual model

    • R K Mohindra
    2007 33:71-75

  • Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources

    • H-W Denker
    2006 32:665-671

  • Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers

    • J Schildmann,
    • L Doyal,
    • A Cushing,
    • and J Vollmann
    2006 32:567-570

  • Polemic: five proposals for a medical school admission policy

    • C Cowley
    2006 32:491-494

  • Clinical ethical dilemmas: convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities

    • A M Stiggelbout,
    • A S Elstein,
    • B Molewijk,
    • W Otten,
    • and J Kievit
    2006 32:381-388

  • Why the apparent haste to clone humans?

    • N Cobbe
    2006 32:298-302

  • Advance directives to protect embryos?

    • K Devolder
    2005 31:497-498

  • The acceptability of ending a patient’s life

    • M Guedj,
    • M Gibert,
    • A Maudet,
    • M T Muñoz Sastre,
    • E Mullet,
    • and P C Sorum
    2005 31:311-317

  • Relatives’ knowledge of decision making in intensive care

    • M G Booth,
    • P Doherty,
    • R Fairgrieve,
    • and J Kinsella
    2004 30:459-461

  • The right not to know: an autonomy based approach

    • R Andorno
    2004 30:435-439

  • ‘Til Death Us Do Part: the ethics of postmortem gamete donation

    • M J Parker
    2004 30:387-388

  • Communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to hospitalised patients

    • R Sivakumar,
    • J Knight,
    • C Devlin,
    • P Keir,
    • P Ghosh,
    • and S Khan
    2004 30:311-312

  • Ethics briefings 2003 29:369-370

  • Introducing "ERIC", a living research ethics database

    • H T Davies,
    • and T Wiseman
    2003 29:117

  • Psychiatric research: what ethical concerns do LRECs encounter? A postal survey

    • D P J Osborn,
    • and K W M Fulford
    2003 29:55-56

  • 2002 28:133-210

  • 2002 28:63-132

  • 2001 27:361-416

Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of JME.
View free sample issue >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.

  • Email Alert Signup