rss

Journal of Medical Ethics
Supplementary Material

Supplementary material related to the following articles is available online:

  • Process and consensus: ethical decision-making in the infertility clinic—a qualitative study

    • L Frith
    2009 35:662-667

  • Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN1412

    • P Knapp,
    • D K Raynor,
    • J Silcock,
    • and B Parkinson
    2009 35:573-578

  • Researchers’ preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain

    • M Ruiz-Canela,
    • J I Valle-Mansilla,
    • and D P Sulmasy
    2009 35:251-257

  • Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study

    • N Sofaer,
    • C Thiessen,
    • S D Goold,
    • J Ballou,
    • K A Getz,
    • G Koski,
    • R A Krueger,
    • and J S Weissman
    2009 35:183-188

  • Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research

    • A van der Vorm,
    • M J F J Vernooij-Dassen,
    • P G Kehoe,
    • M G M Olde Rikkert,
    • E van Leeuwen,
    • and W J M Dekkers
    2009 35:140-144

  • Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?

    • M Johri,
    • L J Damschroder,
    • B J Zikmund-Fisher,
    • S Y H Kim,
    • and P A Ubel
    2009 35:57-64

  • Optimising the documentation practices of an Ethics Consultation Service

    • K A Bramstedt,
    • A R Jonsen,
    • W S Andereck,
    • J W McGaughey,
    • and A B Neidich
    2009 35:47-50

  • Determining the need for ethical review: a three-stage Delphi study

    • J Reynolds,
    • N Crichton,
    • W Fisher,
    • and S Sacks
    2008 34:889-894

  • A report on small team clinical ethics consultation programmes in Japan

    • M Fukuyama,
    • A Asai,
    • K Itai,
    • and S Bito
    2008 34:858-862

  • Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos

    • S Camporesi,
    • and G Boniolo
    2008 34:821-825

  • Medical students’ attitudes towards abortion: a UK study

    • R Gleeson,
    • E Forde,
    • E Bates,
    • S Powell,
    • E Eadon-Jones,
    • and H Draper
    2008 34:783-787

  • Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children

    • P Weisleder
    2008 34:e8

  • Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers

    • N J Kerruish,
    • D Webster,
    • and N Dickson
    2008 34:648-652

  • Lives in a chiaroscuro. Should we suspend the puberty of children with gender identity disorder?

    • S Giordano
    2008 34:580-584

  • Illegal beings. Human cloning and the law

    • Daniela E Cutas
    2008 34:510

  • Malawians permit research bronchoscopy due to perceived need for healthcare

    • N Mtunthama,
    • R Malamba,
    • N French,
    • M E Molyneux,
    • E E Zijlstra,
    • and S B Gordon
    2008 34:303-307

  • Research ethics and lessons from Hwanggate: what can we learn from the Korean cloning fraud?

    • R Saunders,
    • and J Savulescu
    2008 34:214-221

  • Should post-trial provision of beneficial experimental interventions be mandatory in developing countries?

    • Zhiyong Zong
    2008 34:188-192

  • A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries

    • G Bosshard,
    • B Broeckaert,
    • D Clark,
    • L J Materstvedt,
    • B Gordijn,
    • and H C Müller-Busch
    2008 34:28-32

  • Ethical and policy issues relating to progenitor-cell-based strategies for prevention of atherosclerosis

    • S M Liao,
    • P J Goldschmidt,
    • and J Sugarman
    2007 33:643-646

  • Ethics briefings

    • Veronica English,
    • Danielle Hamm,
    • Caroline Harrison,
    • Rebecca Mussell,
    • Julian Sheather,
    • and Ann Sommerville
    2007 33:433-434

  • Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations

    • Colleen C Denny,
    • and Christine Grady
    2007 33:382-385

  • CORRECTION 2007 33:310

  • Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students

    • C O Sham,
    • Y W Cheng,
    • K W Ho,
    • P H Lai,
    • L W Lo,
    • H L Wan,
    • C Y Wong,
    • Y N Yeung,
    • S H Yuen,
    • and A Y C Wong
    2007 33:261-265

  • Concepts of "person" and "liberty," and their implications to our fading notions of autonomy

    • Tuija Takala
    2007 33:225-228

  • The concept of brain death did not evolve to benefit organ transplants

    • Calixto Machado,
    • Julius Kerein,
    • Yazmina Ferrer,
    • Liana Portela,
    • Maria de la C García,
    • and José M Manero
    2007 33:197-200

  • Kant, curves and medical learning practice: a reply to Le Morvan and Stock

    • J Ives
    2007 33:119-122

  • CORRECTION 2007 33:93

  • Medical futility: a conceptual model

    • R K Mohindra
    2007 33:71-75

  • Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources

    • H-W Denker
    2006 32:665-671

  • Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers

    • J Schildmann,
    • L Doyal,
    • A Cushing,
    • and J Vollmann
    2006 32:567-570

  • Polemic: five proposals for a medical school admission policy

    • C Cowley
    2006 32:491-494

  • Clinical ethical dilemmas: convergent and divergent views of two scholarly communities

    • A M Stiggelbout,
    • A S Elstein,
    • B Molewijk,
    • W Otten,
    • and J Kievit
    2006 32:381-388

  • Why the apparent haste to clone humans?

    • N Cobbe
    2006 32:298-302

  • Advance directives to protect embryos?

    • K Devolder
    2005 31:497-498

  • The acceptability of ending a patient’s life

    • M Guedj,
    • M Gibert,
    • A Maudet,
    • M T Muñoz Sastre,
    • E Mullet,
    • and P C Sorum
    2005 31:311-317

  • Relatives’ knowledge of decision making in intensive care

    • M G Booth,
    • P Doherty,
    • R Fairgrieve,
    • and J Kinsella
    2004 30:459-461

  • The right not to know: an autonomy based approach

    • R Andorno
    2004 30:435-439

  • ‘Til Death Us Do Part: the ethics of postmortem gamete donation

    • M J Parker
    2004 30:387-388

  • Communicating information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation to hospitalised patients

    • R Sivakumar,
    • J Knight,
    • C Devlin,
    • P Keir,
    • P Ghosh,
    • and S Khan
    2004 30:311-312

  • Ethics briefings 2003 29:369-370

  • Introducing "ERIC", a living research ethics database

    • H T Davies,
    • and T Wiseman
    2003 29:117

  • Psychiatric research: what ethical concerns do LRECs encounter? A postal survey

    • D P J Osborn,
    • and K W M Fulford
    2003 29:55-56

  • 2002 28:133-210

  • 2002 28:63-132

  • 2001 27:361-416

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.