Article info
Research ethics
Paper
The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Correspondence to Dr Gardar Arnason, Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Gartenstrasse 47, 72074 Tübingen, Germany; gardar.arnason{at}uni-tuebingen.de
Citation
The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
Publication history
- Received July 24, 2016
- Revised June 13, 2017
- Accepted September 27, 2017
- First published October 14, 2017.
Online issue publication
April 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 October 2017).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Non-human primates: the appropriate subjects of biomedical research?
- Objections still fail: a response to Faria
- Is there a place for animal experiments?
- A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Ethical issues when modelling brain disorders innon-human primates
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Still afraid of needy post-persons