Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Erdoğan intensifies assault on Turkish civil society
Deeply worrying reports from the Turkish Medical Association (TTB) suggest that the Turkish President Recep Erdoğan is hardening his attack on civil society in Turkey, using the legitimate activities of the TTB as the flimsiest of pretexts. In January 2018, the TTB issued a short statement raising concerns about the impact on public health of Turkey’s military operation in the Kurdish-controlled region of northern Syria. It denounced the operation saying ‘No to war, peace immediately’. In response to the Association’s press release, the Turkish president publicly accused the 83 000 strong TTB of being terrorist sympathisers. ‘This institution has nothing to do with Turkishness and nothing about them is worthy of the notion of Turkishness’, he said.1
Eleven of its senior doctors, including the Association’s chairman, were later detained following an order from a Turkish prosecutor. President Erdoğan made it clear that Turkish authorities would prosecute anyone criticising the Syrian incursion.
Following international condemnation, including by the World Medical Association and the British Medical Association, the doctors were released on probation. Subsequently, however, we understand that the Turkish Health Minister, Ahmet Demirican, has filed a lawsuit against the TTB. He is quoted as saying the TTB ‘had no right’ to issue their statement in January and that the medics would face judicial proceedings. In a further, deeply worrying development, we understand that President Erdoğan is seeking to pass sweeping laws that will dismantle all independent national professional associations in Turkey, prohibit independent associations from using the word ‘Turkey’ or ‘Turkish’ in their titles and remove obligations for any professional to be a member of a relevant professional association.
Details of the legislation have not been released, but the state-run Anadolu news agency said membership of the TTB would no longer be a requirement to practise medicine privately. Similarly, membership of …
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Ethics briefings
- Neonatal deaths: prospective exploration of the causes and process of end-of-life decisions
- Decision making and modes of death in a tertiary neonatal unit
- Worth living or worth dying? The views of the general public about allowing disabled children to die
- When enough is enough; terminating life-sustaining treatment at the patient's request: a survey of attitudes among Swedish physicians and the general public
- Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population
- Ethics briefing
- End-of-life decision-making for newborns: a 12-year experience in Hong Kong
- Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease