Article info
PDFResponse
The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
- Correspondence to Geoff Keeling, Department of Philosophy, Cotham House, University of Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, UK; geoff.keeling.2016{at}my.bristol.ac.uk
Citation
The sensitivity argument against child euthanasia
Publication history
- Received February 17, 2017
- Accepted March 16, 2017
- First published April 5, 2017.
Online issue publication
January 30, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (30 January 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Against euthanasia for children: a response to Bovens
- Child euthanasia: should we just not talk about it?
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Do vets and doctors face similar ethical challenges?
- Navigating parental requests: considering the relational potential standard in paediatric end-of-life care in the paediatric intensive care unit
- Ethics briefing
- What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Ethics briefings
- A threshold of significant harm (f)or a viable alternative therapeutic option?