Article info
Author meets critics
Relevant evidence, reasonable policy and the right to emigrate
- Correspondence to Professor Gillian Brock, University of Auckland — Philosophy, Room 322 Arts 2, 18 Symonds St, Auckland 1142, New Zealand; g.brock{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Relevant evidence, reasonable policy and the right to emigrate
Publication history
- Received March 7, 2016
- Accepted April 12, 2016
- First published May 11, 2016.
Online issue publication
July 26, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 May 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Comment on Brock and Blake: debating brain drain
- What should be done to address losses associated with ‘medical brain drain’?
- Is active recruitment of health workers really not guilty of enabling harm or facilitating wrongdoing?
- Health and social needs of migrant construction workers for big sporting events
- The missing evidence in favour of restricting emigration
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among migrants in shelters in Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico
- What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
- Searching for accountability: can the WHO global action plan for refugees and migrants deliver?
- Spatial–temporal trends in forced migrant mortality, 2014–2018
- We want to help: ethical challenges of medical migration and brain waste during a pandemic