Article Text
Author meets critics
The missing evidence in favour of restricting emigration
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i You might say: it is too demanding to expect all public policies to meet these stringent evidentiary standards. Perhaps, but the burden of proof is high for policies that restrict valuable freedoms.
Linked Articles
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
- Author meets critics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Relevant evidence, reasonable policy and the right to emigrate
- What is wrong with the emergency justification of compulsory medical service?
- Defending the active recruitment of health workers: a response to commentators
- The active recruitment of health workers: a defence
- Empirical Bioethics and the Health ‘Brain-Drain’: a qualitative study of the experiential and ethical landscape of compulsory community service for a group of South African doctors
- Is active recruitment of health workers really not guilty of enabling harm or facilitating wrongdoing?
- Managing medical migration from poor countries
- What should be done to address losses associated with ‘medical brain drain’?
- On emergencies and emigration: how (not) to justify compulsory medical service
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation