Article Text
Abstract
We describe a number of conscientious objection cases in a liberal Western democracy. These cases strongly suggest that the typical conscientious objector does not object to unreasonable, controversial professional services—involving torture, for instance—but to the provision of professional services that are both uncontroversially legal and that patients are entitled to receive. We analyse the conflict between these patients' access rights and the conscientious objection accommodation demanded by monopoly providers of such healthcare services. It is implausible that professionals who voluntarily join a profession should be endowed with a legal claim not to provide services that are within the scope of the profession's practice and that society expects them to provide. We discuss common counterarguments to this view and reject all of them.
- Conscientious Objection
- Abortion
- Suicide/Assisted Suicide
- Euthanasia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- Justice
- Response
- Response
- Response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- The BMA's guidance on conscientious objection may be contrary to human rights law
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Response to: ‘Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies’ by Schuklenk and Smalling