Article info
The concise argument
Going above and beneath the call of duty: the luck egalitarian claims of healthcare heroes, and the accomodation of professionally-motivated treatment refusal
- Correspondence to Dr Thomas Douglas; thomas.douglas{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Going above and beneath the call of duty: the luck egalitarian claims of healthcare heroes, and the accomodation of professionally-motivated treatment refusal
Publication history
- First published November 23, 2017.
Online issue publication
November 23, 2017
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Distributive justice and the harm to medical professionals fighting epidemics
- Solidarity, justice and unconditional access to healthcare
- A framework for luck egalitarianism in health and healthcare
- How the past matters for the future: a luck egalitarian sustainability principle for healthcare resource allocation
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Just health responsibility
- Feiring's concept of forward-looking responsibility: a dead end for responsibility in healthcare