Citation Tools
PDFMini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
Commentary
Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
Other content recommended for you
- New tobacco and nicotine products in Latin America and the Caribbean: assessing the market and regulatory environment
- Moving targets: how the rapidly changing tobacco and nicotine landscape creates advertising and promotion policy challenges
- Longitudinal transitions of exclusive and polytobacco electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) use among youth, young adults and adults in the USA: findings from the PATH Study Waves 1–3 (2013–2016)
- Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review
- Trajectories of ENDS and cigarette use among dual users: analysis of waves 1 to 5 of the PATH Study
- Electronic nicotine delivery systems: the need for continued regulatory innovation
- Changing patterns of cigarette and ENDS transitions in the USA: a multistate transition analysis of youth and adults in the PATH Study in 2015–2017 vs 2017–2019
- Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use
- “I’m both smoking and vaping”: a longitudinal qualitative study of US young adults who tried to quit smoking cigarettes by using electronic cigarettes
- Electronic nicotine delivery system use behaviour and loss of autonomy among American Indians: results from an observational study