Article info
PDFMini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
Commentary
Replies to Shein, Voigt and Chapman
- Correspondence to Dr Daniel Halliday, 1Philosophy, University of Melbourne, East Wing, Old Quad Building, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; daniel.halliday{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Replies to Shein, Voigt and Chapman
Publication history
- Received February 29, 2016
- Accepted March 2, 2016
- First published April 5, 2016.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- The ethics of a smoking licence
- Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking
- Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy
- Tobacco product prices before and after a statewide tobacco tax increase
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies
- Cigarette taxation and price differentials in 195 countries during 2014–2018
- Tobacco taxation, illegal cigarette supply and geography: findings from the ITC Uruguay Surveys
- Halliday's ‘The ethics of a smoking licence’
- The economics of tobacco: myths and realities