Article info
Mini-Symposium: Regulating smoking
The ethics of a smoking licence
- Correspondence to Dr Daniel Halliday, Department of Philosophy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia; daniel.halliday{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
The ethics of a smoking licence
Publication history
- Received January 15, 2013
- Revised October 17, 2013
- Accepted November 5, 2013
- First published December 11, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 December 2013).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Replies to Shein, Voigt and Chapman
- Daniel Halliday, ‘The Ethics of a Smoking License’
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy
- What's the point of tobacco control? Comment on Dan Halliday, ‘The ethics of a smoking licence’
- Effects of cigarette tax on cigarette consumption and the Chinese economy
- Regulating the tobacco retail environment: beyond reducing sales to minors
- Economics of tobacco control in Pakistan: estimating elasticities of cigarette demand
- Estimates of the economic contributions of the bidi manufacturing industry in India
- Economic and public health impact of 2007–2010 tobacco tax increases in Ukraine