Article info
Correction
Correction
Citation
Correction
Publication history
- First published March 1, 2016.
Online issue publication
September 12, 2020
Article Versions
- Previous version (12 September 2020).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- The Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability: a rejoinder to Roberts
- Having hands and moral status: a reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Interventions for mental health problems in children and adults with severe intellectual disabilities: a systematic review
- What moral status should be accorded to those human beings who have profound intellectual disabilities? A reply to Curtis and Vehmas
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Prostitution, disability and prohibition
- Education versus screening: the use of capacity to consent tools in psychiatric genomics
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?