Article info
Feature article
Response
Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries
- Correspondence to Dr Kavita Shah Arora, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA; Kavita.Shah.Arora{at}gmail.com
Citation
Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries
Publication history
- Received January 6, 2016
- Accepted January 7, 2016
- First published February 22, 2016.
Online issue publication
February 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 February 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- Cutting slack and cutting corners: an ethical and pragmatic response to Arora and Jacobs’ ‘Female genital alteration: a compromise solution’
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty
- Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision
- Infant circumcision: the last stand for the dead dogma of parental (sovereignal) rights
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom—critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation
- The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision