Article info
Editorial
Female genital mutilation: multiple practices, multiple wrongs
- Correspondence to Dr Michael Dunn, The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; michael.dunn{at}ethox.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Female genital mutilation: multiple practices, multiple wrongs
Publication history
- Accepted February 10, 2016
- First published February 22, 2016.
Online issue publication
February 25, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 February 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Female genital alteration: a compromise solution
- In defence of genital autonomy for children
- Health and human rights in contemporary humanitarian crises: is Kosovo more important than Sierra Leone?
- Population-based survey methods to quantify associations between human rights violations and health outcomes among internally displaced persons in eastern Burma
- Female genital mutilation: making the case for good practice
- Harm reduction and female genital alteration: a response to the commentaries
- Female genital mutilation: the law as it relates to children
- The impact of health education on attitudes of parents and religious leaders towards female genital mutilation
- Economic burden of female genital mutilation in 27 high-prevalence countries
- Female genital cutting in Malaysia: a mixed-methods study