Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Commentary
Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
- Correspondence to Dr Alberto Giubilini, Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), Charles Sturt University, Barton, 10-12 Brisbane Avenue, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia; agiubilini{at}csu.edu.au
Citation
Conscientious objection and medical tribunals
Publication history
- Received April 20, 2015
- Accepted May 17, 2015
- First published June 4, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: new directions
- Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile