Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Response
In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- Correspondence to Dr Robert F Card, Department of Philosophy, SUNY-Oswego, 212 Campus Center, Oswego, NY 13126, USA; robert.card7{at}gmail.com
Citation
In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
Publication history
- Received July 27, 2015
- Accepted August 12, 2015
- First published September 24, 2015.
Online issue publication
June 16, 2023
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 June 2023).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Conscientious objection and healthcare in the UK: why tribunals are not the answer
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Conscientious objection and medical tribunals