Article info
Current controversy
Paper
Is moral bioenhancement dangerous?
- Correspondence to Nicholas Drake, School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand; Nicholas.Drake{at}vuw.ac.nz
Citation
Is moral bioenhancement dangerous?
Publication history
- Received June 16, 2015
- Revised September 23, 2015
- Accepted October 16, 2015
- First published November 9, 2015.
Online issue publication
December 15, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (9 November 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Moral bioenhancement, freedom and reasoning
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Taking liberties with free fall
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- The moral bioenhancement of psychopaths