Article info
PDFReproductive ethics
Paper
Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Correspondence to Dr Joshua May, Philosophy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 900 13th Street South, HB 425, Birmingham 35294-1260, USA; joshmay{at}uab.edu
Citation
Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
Publication history
- Received February 20, 2015
- Revised September 4, 2015
- Accepted October 2, 2015
- First published October 23, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Other content recommended for you
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- The role of emotion in ethics and bioethics: dealing with repugnance and disgust
- Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
- Cell phoney: human cloning after Quintavalle
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Illegal beings. Human cloning and the law