Article info
PDFCommentary
Substituted judgment in real life
- Correspondence to Professor Rebecca Dresser, Department of Law, Washington University, St Louis, MO 63130, USA; dresser{at}wulaw.wustl.edu
Citation
Substituted judgment in real life
Publication history
- Received October 1, 2014
- Accepted October 17, 2014
- First published November 6, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Clarifying substituted judgement: the endorsed life approach
- The implausibility of response shifts in dementia patients
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- A new kind of paternalism in surrogate decision-making? The case of Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v MSP
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- The capacity to designate a surrogate is distinct from decisional capacity: normative and empirical considerations
- The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial
- Making medical decisions for an incompetent older adult when both a proxy and an advance directive are available: which is more likely to reflect the older adult’s preferences?
- Trial by Triad: substituted judgment, mental illness and the right to die