Article info
PDFViewpoint
Response
Bike helmets: a reply to replies
- Correspondence to Dr Carwyn Rhys Hooper, Division of Population Health & Education, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK; hoopercarwyn{at}googlemail.com
Citation
Bike helmets: a reply to replies
Publication history
- Received July 16, 2013
- Accepted July 19, 2013
- First published August 6, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Liberty or death; don't tread on me
- The effects of provincial bicycle helmet legislation on helmet use and bicycle ridership in Canada
- In defence of mandatory bicycle helmet legislation: response to Hooper and Spicer
- Helmet legislation and admissions to hospital for cycling related head injuries in Canadian provinces and territories: interrupted time series analysis
- Economic disparity in bicycle helmet use by children six years after the introduction of legislation
- Mandatory helmet legislation and children's exposure to cycling
- Prevalence of helmet use by users of bicycles, push scooters, inline skates and skateboards in Toronto and the surrounding area in the absence of comprehensive legislation: an observational study
- Bicycle helmet prevalence two years after the introduction of mandatory use legislation for under 18 year olds in Alberta, Canada
- Systematic reviews of bicycle helmet research
- Sports helmets now and in the future