Article info
Research ethics
Commentary
Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
- Correspondence to Professor Oliver Hallich, Philosophical Department, University Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstraße 12, Essen 45117, Germany; oliver.hallich{at}uni-due.de
Citation
Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests
Publication history
- Received October 25, 2014
- Accepted January 21, 2015
- First published February 11, 2015.
Online issue publication
July 24, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (11 February 2015).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research
- Limits of advance directives in decision-making around food and nutrition in patients with dementia
- Should we respect precedent autonomy in life-sustaining treatment decisions?
- Advance directives for oral feeding in dementia: a response to Shelton and Geppert
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Precedent autonomy should be respected in life-sustaining treatment decisions
- Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Clarifying best interests