Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Correspondence to Professor Julian Savulescu, Faculty of Philosophy, The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, The Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Suite 8, Littlegate House, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK; julian.savulescu{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
Publication history
- Received August 23, 2013
- Accepted September 2, 2013
- First published January 10, 2014.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Are we unfit for the future?
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Freedom and moral enhancement
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Being good enough to prevent the worst