Article info
PDFAuthor meets critics: response
Are we unfit for the future?
- Correspondence to Dr Tom L Beauchamp, Department of Philosophy and Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Healy Bldg. Rm 425, Washington, DC 20057, USA; beauchat{at}georgetown.edu
Citation
Are we unfit for the future?
Publication history
- Received July 16, 2013
- Accepted July 16, 2013
- First published December 17, 2013.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Taking liberties with free fall
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- Frequently overlooked realistic moral bioenhancement interventions
- Freedom and moral enhancement