Article info
Editorial
Being good enough to prevent the worst
- Correspondence to Professor Michael Hauskeller, Department of Sociology and Philosophy, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX44RJ, UK; M.Hauskeller{at}exeter.ac.uk
Citation
Being good enough to prevent the worst
Publication history
- Received September 11, 2013
- Accepted October 1, 2013
- First published January 16, 2014.
Online issue publication
March 23, 2015
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 January 2014).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Are we unfit for the future?
- Voluntary moral enhancement and the survival-at-any-cost bias
- Moral enhancement, freedom, and what we (should) value in moral behaviour
- On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- Moral bioenhancement is dangerous
- A question about defining moral bioenhancement
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement