Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The right to know and genetic testing
Citation
The right to know and genetic testing
Publication history
- First published March 23, 2015.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of genetic testing and research in sport: a position statement from the Australian Institute of Sport
- From proband to provider: is there an obligation to inform genetic relatives of actionable risks discovered through direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
- Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice
- A clinical approach to genetic testing for non-specialists
- Direct-to-consumer tests advertised online in Australia and their implications for medical overuse: systematic online review and a typology of clinical utility
- Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective
- On the personal utility of Alzheimer’s disease-related biomarker testing in the research context
- Knowing me, knowing you
- Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
- Direct to consumer genetic testing