Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

JME Commentaries
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Table of contents

April 2015 - Volume 41 - 4

Journal of Medical Ethics: 41 (4)

The concise argument

The right to know and genetic testing (23 March, 2015) Free
Mark Sheehan

Editorial

Being good enough to prevent the worst (16 January, 2014)
Michael Hauskeller

Clinical ethics

Paper: A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy (25 April, 2014)
Seema K Shah, Kenneth Kasper, Franklin G Miller
Paper: Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donation (26 September, 2014)
Michael Nair-Collins, Sydney R Green, Angelina R Sutin
Commentary: Talking about death is not the same as communicating about death (9 January, 2015)
Stuart J Youngner
Paper: Coercion and choice in parent–child live kidney donation (6 November, 2014)
Philippa Burnell, Sally-Anne Hulton, Heather Draper

Genetics

Direct-to-consumer genomics on the scales of autonomy (5 May, 2014)
Effy Vayena
Commentary: Do genomic tests enhance autonomy? (30 June, 2014)
Eline M Bunnik
Revealing the results of whole-genome sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in research and clinical investigations: some ethical issues (18 July, 2014) Free
Nina Hallowell, Alison Hall, Corinna Alberg, Ron Zimmern
Paper: Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing? (28 May, 2014)
Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer

Research ethics

Paper: Understanding, interests and informed consent: a reply to Sreenivasan (24 April, 2014)
Danielle Bromwich
Paper: Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries (19 April, 2014)
Henry Silverman, Hany Sleem, Keymanthri Moodley, Nandini Kumar, Sudeshni Naidoo, Thilakavathi Subramanian, Rola Jaafar, Malini Moni

Author meets critics

Summary of Unfit for the Future
(13 December, 2013)
Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu
On not taking men as they are: reflections on moral bioenhancement (18 December, 2013)
Paula Casal
Moral bioenhancement is dangerous (17 December, 2013)
Nicholas Agar
Are we unfit for the future? (17 December, 2013)
Tom L Beauchamp
Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
(10 January, 2014)
Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu

Brief reports

Finnish physicians’ attitudes towards active euthanasia have become more positive over the last 10 years (21 January, 2015)
Pekka Louhiala, Heta Enkovaara, Hannu Halila, Heikki Pälve, Jukka Vänskä
Conflict of interest disclosure and the polarisation of scientific communities (20 January, 2015)
Thomas Ploug, Søren Holm

Issue Information